The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On January 1, 1995, the Defendant: (a) around 14:21, the Defendant, the user of which, in the charge, restricted the traffic of freight vehicles with a gross weight of at least 40 tons and a gross weight of at least 10 tons in order to preserve the structure of roads and prevent the danger of traffic in the traffic at the control station of the expressway 7.4km on the road, which is a police station of the expressway; (b) however, the Defendant, at around 14:21, operated the vehicle with a gross weight of 4.7 tons.

2. In the case where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995), among the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995), which is a joint penal provisions, among the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case, the pertinent provision of the Act, "if the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits an offense under subparagraph 1 of Article 84, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under the relevant Article," was sentenced to a decision of

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant shall be acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment shall be announced in accordance with Article 440