The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On November 28, 1996, at around 14:48, the Defendant, the user of the charges, carried 10 tons or more of 10.8 tons of 10.8 tons and 11.4 tons of 4 tons of 10.4 tons of 10 ton of 3 10.8 tons of 2, although he was not able to load and operate the 10.4 tons of 10 ton of 4 1.4 tons of 2, in front of a valley in a valley in a mountainous district where the

2. In the case where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation provided for in Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), among the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is a joint penal provisions, among the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case, the provision that "if the agent, employee, or other worker of the corporation commits a violation as provided for in Article 83 (1) 2, the corporation shall be punished by a fine as provided for in the corresponding Article,

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant shall be acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment shall be announced in accordance with Article 440