Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Daegu High Court-2014-Nu-5294 (2015.09)
Case Number of the previous trial
The early 2013Gu2911
Title
(Rescept of Trial) Any tax invoice different from the fact shall not be deemed to have been negligent in not knowing the fact. (National Roster)
Summary
(In light of the circumstances acknowledged by each summary of the evidence, the Plaintiff is not deemed a bona fide trading party, since the Plaintiff was negligent in failing to properly examine the facts that the actual counterparty of the transaction was aware of or suspected of being the actual counterparty of the transaction, or there was a need to investigate whether the actual counterparty of the transaction was the other party.
Related statutes
Articles 16 and 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act
Cases
2015du36805 Disposition to revoke the imposition of value-added tax.
Plaintiff-Appellant
(State)A
Defendant-Appellee
BB Director of the Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
National Rotations
Imposition of Judgment
May 14, 2015
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by