Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 6, 2014, the Defendant driven BTS125 Obaba in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of 0.153% at a section of approximately 1.5 km from the 3-3rd-ro 93 km of the same Gu-ro 33-3 roads from the 3rd-ro Do-ro, Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government opening of Guro-gu to the roads of the same Gu-ro 93-3rd-ro.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those engaged in driving service with BTS125 Obama;
On May 6, 2014, at around 19:57, the Defendant, while drunk, driven the above Obaba, and operated the three-lane road in front of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Guro-gu in order to open the three-lane road from the luminous side to the opening distance of the 126-30km.
At the time, the center line of yellow-ray is installed at night and at a place, so there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is thoroughly able to drive the motor vehicle in the front line and safely.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the opposite lane due to the negligence of driving the center line, which led to the driving of the victim C(18 years old) by the opposite lane. DCA110 Oba, the left side part of the CA110 Oba, which the Defendant driven, was the front part of the Oba that the Defendant driven.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer from an injury to the base and tension in light of the trend that requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, 259,200 won, such as shock and exchange, etc., for which the repair cost is approximately 259,200 won, such as shock and exchange, carried out without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim by immediately stopping, even after destroying and damaging the lebane owned
3. A defendant who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle on which mandatory insurance is not mandatory on the road, in violation of this Act, and B at the time and place as referred to in paragraph (1).