logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.01.14 2019고단3275
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving service of Oratoba.

On April 16, 2019, the Defendant driven the above Obaon on April 18:57, 2019, and led to the flow from the front side of the Busan Jin-gu to the Ebain.

Since there is a mark of prohibition of direct operation on the road surface, the driver had a duty of care to safely drive the road in accordance with the signals by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in proceeding in violation of the prohibition of direct progress, and the part of the Defendant’s driving in front of the Victim B’s driving where the speed exceeds 48.5 km per hour from the left side of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding to the right side of the speed exceeding 48.5 km per hour.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left-hand body felball, etc., which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving FOba.

On April 16, 2019, the Defendant driven the above Obama on April 18, 2019, and proceeded from the CJo distance to G.

Since there is a limited speed at 30 km per hour, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the restricted speed and operating the steering gear and operating the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and caused the limited speed to exceed 48.5 km per hour, and caused the Defendant to go in violation of the Defendant’s right side of the Defendant’s proceeding, thereby going to the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s drive, wherein the victim’s C is going to go to the port, in contravention of the prohibition of direct go to the port.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer approximately eight weeks by occupational negligence as above.

arrow