Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Cheongju District Court-2018-Gu Partnership-3825 ( April 18, 2019)
Case Number of the previous trial
Cho-2017-former-4361 (Law No. 18, 2018)
Title
Whether educational service exemption from an alternative school without the permission of the competent authority is granted;
Summary
Unauthorized alternative schools shall not be deemed non-profit organizations meeting the terms in permission, authorization, registration, and report of the competent authorities, and the educational services provided by the Unauthorized alternative schools shall not be exempt from tax.
Related statutes
Article 36 (Scope of Tax-Free Educational Services)
Cases
2019Nu1341 Revocation of disposition of imposing corporate tax, etc.
Plaintiff and appellant
】 】
Defendant, Appellant
○ Head of tax office
Judgment of the first instance court
April 18, 2019
Conclusion of Pleadings
October 30, 2019
Imposition of Judgment
November 27, 2019
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the first instance court's decision on July 7, 2017. Each disposition of imposition of KRW 00,000,000 (including additional taxes), the corporate tax of KRW 00,000 (including additional taxes), the corporate tax of KRW 00,000 for the business year 2015, the first value-added tax of KRW 00,000 (including additional taxes), the second value-added tax of KRW 200,000 for the year 2014, the first value-added tax of KRW 00,000 for the year 2015 (including additional taxes), and the second value-added tax of KRW 00,000 for the year 20,000 for the second year of 2015.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
Even if the evidence presented in the first instance court is examined in light of the relevant statutes and legal principles by the Plaintiff’s presentation of evidence to this court, the fact-finding and determination in the first instance court is deemed legitimate. The reason for the judgment is as follows: (a) the term “non-profit organization of the first instance court is not included in the lifelong education law” (which is registered as a non-profit organization of the second instance pursuant to Article 16(1) of the former Museum and Art Gallery Support Act (amended by Act No. 14204, May 29, 2016), and the term “a museum registered as a non-profit organization of the first instance pursuant to the Lifelong Education Act, which is an educational facility law, is included in a non-profit organization of the Lifelong Education Act” (Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act).
If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.