beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2013 Highest 1121"
1. On August 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A household store operated by the victim D in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, would open the interior and construction office.” The household cost was to receive a subcontract for remodeling work equivalent to KRW 300,000,00 among the construction works of the Osan Commercial Building, which was received by the F, and thus, would be paid by the end of September 201 after receiving the payment of the said construction cost.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have been bound by F to permit remodeling construction at the time, and because there was no particular revenue or property, and the personal debt was about KRW 50 million, so the defendant purchased the household from the victim.
Even if there was no intention or ability to pay the price.
Nevertheless, as such, the defendant deceiving the victim and deceiving him from the victim's office, and 22 kinds of households, such as two books equivalent to 10,500,000 won in the market price around August 21, 201, six kinds of households, such as 1,40,000 won in the market price around the 26th day of the same month, 5 kinds of households, such as 1,40,000 won in the market price, and 5 kinds of households, such as 1,40,000 won in the clothes of 940,000 won in the market price around the 30th day of the same month, are the same year.
9.2.Written delivery was received of three kinds of households, including four small-scale households equivalent to the market value of KRW 970,000, respectively.
As a result, the Defendant received from the victim the furniture worth KRW 13,550,000 in total.
2. On August 29, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I want to purchase tin on behalf of the victim I of H. I. It was ordered to receive a subcontract for remodeling works equivalent to KRW 300 million among the Osan Commercial Building Corporation, which was received by F, and thus, the substitute price shall be paid by the end of September 201 after receiving the payment of the said construction cost.”
However, there is no fact that the defendant has been promised by F to allow remodeling work at the time, and there is no particular import.