1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Hyundai Industries Development Co., Ltd.: KRW 746,816,353 and its related thereto from November 8, 2011 to November 201.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a party to the dispute. The plaintiff is a 18-dong 1424 apartment units located in the 23-dong, Busan Jin-gu, Busan and 23-dong (hereinafter "the apartment unit of this case").

(2) The C Apartment Reconstruction Housing Association (hereinafter “the reconstruction association of this case”) is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment after obtaining project approval under the former Housing Construction Promotion Act around 1998. The Defendant Company is a contractor who constructed the instant apartment after being awarded a contract from the reconstruction association of this case under the relevant laws and regulations, and the Defendant Company is a guarantor who constructed the instant apartment after being awarded a contract from the reconstruction association of this case for the new construction of the instant apartment, and the Defendant Association is a guarantor who has concluded a warranty contract between the Defendant Company as follows.

B. On November 17, 2001 through November 16, 2002 (1 year), including the guaranteed amount for the guarantee of the contract for the repair of defects, the company shall set forth the warranty period of 734,004,000 from November 17, 2001 to November 16, 2000 to November 16, 2001 (2 years), as well as the designation of 734,004,0003 on November 16, 200 (2 years), as well as the basis on November 17, 2001 to November 16, 2004 (3 years), as well as the 1,101,06,000,004 (3 years), roof, 10,000 to November 16, 201 (20 to May 16, 201, 10 to 16, 105, 2015 to 16, respectively.

A) The Defendant Company entered into a contract. After undergoing the inspection or examination of the use of the apartment construction of this case, the Defendant Company failed to perform the warranty against defects that occurred within the warranty period even after receiving the request for repair or performance, and thereby guaranteeing the obligation to the other party. (2) The Defendant Company obtained a warranty against defects from the Defendant Company, and deposited the warranty against defects to the head of Busan Jin-si, which is the authority for usage inspection, and the apartment of this case was occupied after receiving the inspection of the use on June 28, 2002.