logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.13 2012가합49266
하자보수금
Text

1. The part of the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against the Defendant New Stock Company, which is sought by subrogation of the Defendant B.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the plaintiff is an autonomous management body composed of the occupants to manage the 632 households of the 6th unit of the A Apartment in Sungsung City (hereinafter referred to as the "the apartment of this case"). The defendant B is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the apartment of this case, the defendant New Airport constructor, and the defendant association are as follows.

A person who has issued a warranty bond for the apartment of this case to the defendant New Security, such as paragraph (1).

B. On February 4, 2002, the Defendant Mutual Association concluded a contract for the repair of defects and issued a warranty bond as indicated below (hereinafter “each guarantee contract of this case”) with the Defendant New Security by setting the guarantee creditor as the real estate market with respect to the apartment of this case as the guarantee creditor (hereinafter “each guarantee contract of this case”).

A) According to the warranty clause of this case, among the new apartment construction works of this case, the warranty period of 35360, 178,932,687 and 35361, among the new apartment construction works of this case from June 17, 2004 to June 16, 2014, the warranty period of 178,932,687 and 35362, among the new apartment construction works of this case, the warranty period of 178,932,687 and 35362, and the warranty period of 357,865,65,67,6865, and the warranty period of the new apartment construction of this case from June 17, 2004 to June 16, 2007 to June 16, 2004 to June 36, 2016 to June 36, 2004;

arrow