logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015.01.29 2014도16475
절도미수등
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance is 2. Gwangju District Court Decision 2014 Godan12, 12.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found all of the charges of this case guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on obstruction of performance

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, on the ground that there is an obvious clerical error in the indication of the first instance judgment.

arrow