The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years and six months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is determined by the following: (a) the Defendant disembarked the victim C’s office door door, opened a correction device by putting the knife, and intrudes the knife and 200,000 won in cash; (b) the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif kn

The Defendant recognized the instant crime, and the part of Article 329 of the Criminal Act, in Article 5-4(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes after the Defendant committed the instant crime, was determined by the Constitutional Court (Supreme Court Decision 2014Hun-Ga16, 19, 23 (Consolidation) Decided February 26, 2015). However, the Defendant again committed the instant crime by a person who had been subject to a criminal disposition five times or more prior criminal records, including three previous criminal records and two previous criminal records, and a person who has been subject to a new criminal disposition, during the night-time offense period, due to a defect in the structure, etc.

In addition, the defendant only claims that the punishment is heavier than that of the above decision of unconstitutionality until the trial is held, and for recovery of damage.