beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff has been working as an office worker of the deceased I (hereinafter “the deceased”) who was working as the reporter of the Republic of Korea State in Taiwan (H) from around 1975 to around 2015, and supported the deceased’s work.
B. On August 12, 2014, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 39,000,000 from the CT Bank’s account under the name of the Plaintiff to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Deceased. On the 14th of the same month, the Plaintiff cancelled the Plaintiff’s post office deposit and received KRW 50,528,460, and then remitted KRW 50,000,000 among them to the Bank’s account in the name of the Deceased.
C. The Deceased died on June 27, 2015, four (4) days before the instant lawsuit was brought, and the Defendants, the spouse and children of the Deceased, jointly inherited the deceased’s property.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-4, Gap evidence 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) on August 12, 2014, the Plaintiff lent KRW 30,000,000 to the Deceased; and (b) on June 14, 2014, KRW 50,000,00 for each of the instant loans (hereinafter “each of the instant loans”); (c) on June 25, 2015, the Deceased paid KRW 31,092,071 to the Plaintiff by having the Plaintiff withdraw the deposit directly from the bank accounts in the name of the Deceased’s name on June 25, 2015; (d) the Defendants, the inheritor of the Deceased, are liable to pay the amount of KRW 48,907,929, and damages for delay from the day following the delivery date of a duplicate of the instant complaint.
B. On August 12, 2014, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 39,000,000 from the Plaintiff’s account to the deceased’s account, and then transferred KRW 30,000,000 among them to the deceased’s account. On the 14th day of the same month, the Plaintiff cancelled the Plaintiff’s term deposit and received KRW 50,528,460, and then remitted KRW 50,000 among them to the deceased’s account, as seen earlier.
However, the evidence mentioned above is included in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number) and the whole purport of the argument.