logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고정917
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”) is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with a d

On February 22, 2017, the Defendant operated the l9:35 above 19:2, and led to the U.S. P. D. U.S. U.S. branch in Daegu Suwon-gu C to U.S. U.S. U.S. P. P. S. P. L.C., the children’s center was under the yellow four-distance outflow.

A person who drives a motor vehicle as his/her duties has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side of his/her way and to accurately operate the steering and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, due to the negligence of U.S., was the victim E (M. 53 years old) who was proceeding two lanes from the four-lanes of the children's hall to the four-lanes of the children's hall, and received the back part of the FMW car driven by the Defendant as the front part of the driving vehicle on the right side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim E, such as scopical salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim G (V, 22 years of age) who boarded the back seat of the damaged vehicle, such as scopic salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time suffered damage equivalent to KRW 10,716,113 of the repair cost after the damaged vehicle.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of a vehicle with detached motor vehicle B.

No owner of any motor vehicle shall operate any motor vehicle, other than those prescribed by Presidential Decree, on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said car without being covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes regarding the occurrence of traffic accidents, report on the actual condition of traffic accidents, inspection report on actual condition, driver's license ledger, tea inquiry, and mandatory insurance inquiry;

1. Article 3(1) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts.

arrow