logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.28 2016나62407
부당이득반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The Defendant, cited the judgment of the first instance, has changed the name of the Defendant into the name as of April 16, 2010 from the Numbucks, Inc. to the Numbuck Internet, Apr. 16, 2015, and the name as of March 24, 2017.

The grounds for appeal by the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and each evidence submitted to the court of first instance is different from the statements in Gap evidence No. 22, 23, and 25 submitted to the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following parts among the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

In Part 2, "Non-Party D and the Plaintiff changed its trade name from P to May 2, 2012 from May 2, 2012." In Part 3, "Co. Ltd. C" was changed from Qa Co., Ltd. on May 2, 2012. Meanwhile, in Part 5, "B" was merged with "J Co., Ltd. on October 12, 2015." In Part 15, "Y B" was "this case's principal reduction" in Part 7, 7, 8, "N" in Part 1, 7, 21 to "D," "No. 12, 8, 13, 10, 100, 100, 300, 100, 100, 300, 100, 100, 100, 200, 100, 300,000, 10,000.

arrow