logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.10.27 2016고단2774
사전자기록등위작등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 25, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Busan District Court on July 19, 2010, a fine of two million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Busan District Court on July 19, 201, and a fine of three million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Changwon District Court on October 12, 2015, respectively.

1. Around January 22, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving a D car at a section of about 50 meters from the road front of a mutual influent restaurant located in Kimhae-si B to the road front of the convenience store located in the same Dong, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.08% of blood alcohol without a vehicle driving license.

2. At around 22:06 on January 8, 2016, the Defendant entered the name and resident registration number of the co-born G in order to conceal the fact that the Defendant was a non-licensed person, who was in the middle of the Kimhae Police Station E-district, and was in the middle of the Kimhae Police Station, and was controlled by F for the same reason as that of paragraph (1), and was requested to verify the identity of the Defendant, on the road front of the C convenience store located in Kimhae-si B.

Accordingly, F made G as a driver using a portable information device (PDA) and demanded the Defendant to sign the confirmation on the result of drinking driving control, and the Defendant signed at any time in the signature column of the driver confirmation part of the above notification, thereby allowing F to transmit it to the police internal computer network.

Accordingly, the Defendant entered and exercised the record of the prior person in G on the certification of facts with a view to hindering the management of affairs.

3. The Defendant forged a private document, or uttering of a private document, stated “G” in the name column of the part of confirmation of the driver of the report, who was requested by F to prepare the part of the driver’s confirmation in the report on the state of the driver’s identity at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, and signed next to that.

arrow