logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단5506
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 28, 2017, the Defendant was required to return home from the F of the services for a police box called “D Magaz shop” located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, Macheon-gun, the Defendant reported 112 at the above Magaz shop on charges of fing the f of the services for a police box called out, and called out.

Defendant 1: (a) carried out physical fighting with a police officer’s chest in order to have him invalid without returning home; and (b) carried out f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s fat;

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted F and G and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of report 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. A H statement;

1. Each investigation report (with respect to inter-copis for the purpose of a crime-copisive vision photographs, visual blives photographs, visual blives appendix - dynamics attached to visual blives);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the log where E police boxes work, notification to the department related to the report of the case of 112, guard F, and slope G damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In order to establish the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (which is not subject to sentencing guidelines by choice of penalty) and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish a crime against public authority, such as interference with the performance of official duties.

The criminal defendant's assaulted a police officer who gets home under the influence of alcohol while taking a bath, and the responsibility for the crime is not weak.

However, the defendant has recognized his mistake as a whole and is in depth divided.

The degree of violence was not so severe.

It has no record of the same crime and has been punished once before.

It seems that the injured police officers are able to find and receive a letter.

arrow