The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the above sentence was finalized on the 12th of the same month. The facts were obtained from the victim B the sum total of 391,000 won, including the “D restaurant,” in the first floor below the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul building C on March 16, 2014, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with the alcohol and communication from the victim B, and the Defendant received the victim’s speech and communication order from the victim and acquired the victim’s share amounting to 391,00 won in total, such as the “D restaurant,” in the first floor below the Seoul Mapo-gu building C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared B;

1. Receipts:

1. Previous records: Criminal records and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Handling concurrent crimes and exemption of punishment: The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act (In consideration of equity in cases where a judgment has been rendered simultaneously with a judgment of Suwon District Court 2014Kadan1476, which became final and conclusive);