Text
Defendant
B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.
Defendant
B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.
Reasons
The defendant is a caregiver working in Seo-gu Seoul Building D, Seo-gu, Incheon.
In the above medical center, patients suffering from dementia have been admitted to the hospital, and dementia patients are suffering from dementia, and in particular, the victim F (n, 85 years old) is elderly dementia patients, and the victim F (n, 85 years old) is frequently faced with the body of the married, the care center, and the back of the hospital. Therefore, the defendant has a duty of care to take appropriate measures, such as preventing accidents in advance and reporting to the president immediately in the event of an accident.
Nevertheless, the Defendant knew that the victim was able to lead the body of the deceased and return to the back of the hospital and the back of the hospital. Before that, the Defendant did not take any measure such as checking the state of injury or reporting to the president, etc. of the victim’s back of the hospital and the victim’s back of the hospital and the back of the hospital and the back of the clinic and allowing the victim to leave the victim in the front of the back of the clinic and leaving the victim unpersonally unpersonally unpersonally unpersonally unpersonally, on May 12, 2018.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the fourth cutting to the right-hand side where the victim could not know the number of days of treatment due to such occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant B’s partial statement
1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police officer;
1. Each police statement made to G, H and I;
1. Photographs photographs of damaged parts;
1. The defendant B and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not have contributed to the injury of the victim by negligence. The investigation report (CCTV-related investigation integration), investigation report (the contents of the first conversation with the victim F) (the victim F).
However, the defendant has recommended the victim who has difficulty in living in the emergency exit to stay in the emergency exit.