logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.10.30 2019가단200187
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant against the Plaintiff A’s KRW 10,00,000, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I respectively, and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From around 2017, the Defendant has been operating the Mcare Center located in the Seo-gu Incheon Building L (hereinafter “Defendant Care Center”).

B. Plaintiff A (N) is a dementia patient who is moving to a bridge due to the lack of independent walking, and the remaining Plaintiffs are children of Plaintiff A, without submitting a written contract with the Defendant, etc., the Plaintiffs asserted that all the Plaintiffs bear medical care fees as a contracting party, and the Defendant did not clearly dispute this. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs are determined on the premise that they are parties to the contract.

A around April 10, 2018, the Defendant entered into a long-term care contract with the Plaintiff as a user, and the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Medical Care Center from that time.

C. During the period of being admitted to the Defendant Medical Center, Plaintiff A was frequently able to take care of the body of a usual couple and take out of the hospital’s emotional and back language. However, Nonparty A, who was employed by the Defendant Medical Center, was able to take care of the Plaintiff, and Nonparty A, who was employed as a caregiver at the Defendant Medical Center, said that the latter part of the Plaintiff was able to take care of the Plaintiff.

O neglected a plaintiff who was mixed before the back of the non-human being, and caused the plaintiff A to put him in the back of the medical care center at around 18:55 on May 12, 2018. At around that time, the plaintiff witness that the both horses of the plaintiff A were broken off in the part of the emergency exit, and did not take measures such as checking the state of injury or reporting to the defendant, even though the plaintiff knew that the both horses of the plaintiff A were broken out in the part of the emergency exit.

In this O's negligence, the plaintiff A suffered from injury such as the fourth cutting on the right side.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

A public prosecution against the defendant andO was instituted by occupational injury by the Incheon District Court 2019Kadan1275. On August 16, 2019, the acquittal judgment against the defendant and theO was guilty of a fine of KRW 3,00,000 for theO.

arrow