Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven hundred thousand won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are legal marital relations.

1. On February 16, 2016, Defendant A, who was parked in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F apartment complex around 20:30, in a passenger car owned by the Defendant, brought a dispute to the victim B (the 29-year old) and the knife to travel overseas, and was coming from the car, and the victim got off from the car, and caused the victim to go beyond the victim's chest part of the victim's chest, thereby causing the victim to go beyond the victim's chest for about three weeks medical treatment.

2. Defendant B

A. On April 2016, the Defendant, at around 158 Dong 1503, the Defendant residing in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, released the cell phone diving screen without A’s consent, and infringed on the other’s secrets kept by the information and communications network by viewing the Kakao Stockholm message sent and received with H and I.

B. Around July 7, 2016, the Defendant, at the Seoul Family Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Family Court located in 193, as Gangnam-gu, Seoul, divulged another’s secret stored in the information and communications network by submitting the Defendant’s cell phone-based Stockholm message attached to the Defendant’s written response of divorce lawsuit No. 2-A.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness A and B;

1. Each complaint;

1. A certificate of injury diagnosis, or a copy of medical records;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (B permanent photo attachment);

1. Article 256(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 256(1) of the same Act; Article 71(1)11 and Article 49 of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc.; Selection of fines for a crime;

1. Aggravated concurrent crimes by Defendant B: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant A and Defendant A.