1. The Defendant: KRW 5,834,00 for Plaintiff A; KRW 2,802,00 for Plaintiff B; KRW 6,884,00 for Plaintiff C; and KRW 2,802,00 for Plaintiff D.

In full view of the purport of Gap evidence No. 2 (including paper numbers), the defendant was indicted as the case of fraud in Chuncheon District Court's early branch court's 2017dan98, 268, and 309 (combined) and was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment on October 18, 2017, and the above judgment is recognized through the defendant's appeal (2017No510).

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff Gap 5,834,00 won [=2,802,00 won per 1 / 2,800 won per 1 / 2,802,00 won per 3,00 won per 3], 2,802,000 won per 2,884,000 won [3] 6,800 won per 4/800 per 2,800 won per 2,800 won per 2,000 won per 2,802,000 won per 2,000 won per 2,00 won per 2,800 won per 2,000 won per 2,00 won per 2,00 won per 2,800 won per 2,00 won per 2,000 won per 2,000 won per 2,000 won per 2,000 won per 160 won per /600 won per

As to this, the defendant set up a defense that he partially repaid to the plaintiffs, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, so the above defense cannot be accepted.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are justified, and all of them are accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.