Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 233,290,000 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 50,000,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) each of them, from September 20, 2018 to July 20, 2019.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 20, 2018, the Defendant was prosecuted on the charges of fraud against the Plaintiffs, etc. and sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months in this court [2017Da1476, 2230, 3377 (Merger)], and the Defendant’s fraud against the victim A (Plaintiff A) at the appellate court on May 16, 2019, and on September 27, 2019, at the Defendant’s residence of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building E, the Defendant made a false statement that “on September 27, 2013, the Defendant would also guarantee the principal if he/she receives money from the domestic account designated by the Plaintiff, and would also make a false statement to the victim that “in the event he/she will receive money from the domestic account, he/she would also make it a high interest.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have to purchase USD, remaining public currency, dumond, etc., and he thought that most of the money received from the victim A was used for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc., but did not have any intention or ability to guarantee the principal or to make a higher interest.
Nevertheless, on September 27, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim A, received KRW 4 million from the victim A to the single bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant, from around September 27, 2013. From that time, the Defendant, as described in Nos. 2 through 19, 21 through 33, No. 1, and No. 2 of the Criminal List (2), and No. 2 of the Criminal List (H) No. 1, 2014, remitted KRW 37829,00 in total to the above one bank account in the name of the Defendant and the G bank (H).
Attached Form
5 million won in the list of crimes (1) Nos. 1-5 million won cannot be excluded from the possibility that the money that the plaintiff transferred to the defendant by the defendant to the beauty room transfer, and 20-41 million won in the No. 20-1 shall not be excluded from the possibility that the money that the plaintiff transferred to the defendant by the plaintiff A to the defendant as an investment in the Bab restaurant.
2. On October 22, 2013, the Defendant, as the Defendant, against the victim B (Plaintiff B), made a false statement to A as set forth in paragraph 1, and A made such a statement to the victim B.