logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원서부지원 2020.08.14 2020고단307
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged is revised to the extent that it is not disadvantageous to the defendant's defense right.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle with unregistered 125cc c.

On October 17, 2019, at around 12:45, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and driven the front side road of the C cafeteria located in Busan, which is the location of the accident, in the direction of the c cafeteria at the entrance of the Yong-Nam Middle School.

In such cases, it is difficult to immediately suspend the operation of the operation and steering gear due to the neglect of the pre-crisoning market price and the sense of the loss, despite the fact that the operation of the operation and steering gear is difficult.

At the latest, the victim who was prone in the mash-in, was found to be late, but the part of the victim D (the age of 65) was knee in front.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered kneee, knenee, and knee in detail by negligence in the above-mentioned occupational negligence.

2. On March 23, 2007, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of fine of 1.5 million won by the Busan District Court as a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

The defendant is found to have driven under the influence of alcohol due to considerable grounds that the defendant's breath and face with strong smelling in his/her entrance is red, and the response is found to have been detected and found to have been driven under the influence of alcohol as a result of confirming that he/she was under the influence of alcohol, and thus, he/she has a considerable reason to recognize that he/she was driven under the influence of alcohol, and thus, he/she has been voluntarily driven to a traffic investigation office office and has been requested to take a drinking measuring instrument from a slope E by inserting the breath, but has not been injected in the manner of blocking the breath in the influence of alcohol, such as ① refusal of the first alcohol measurement at around 13:30 on the same day, ② refusal of the second alcohol measurement at around 03:50 on the same day, ③ refusal of the second alcohol measurement at around 13:55 on the same day, ④ refusal of the second alcohol measurement at around 14:0 on the same day,

arrow