logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.12.20 2018가합58790
청구이의
Text

1. The period set forth in paragraph 1, among the protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol 2013 rendered by the defendant against the plaintiff of the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person running a wedding hall business in the 1st underground and 7th ground-based D buildings located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant building”), and the Defendant is the owner of the instant building.

B. On January 1, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to lease the instant building with a deposit of KRW 500 million, monthly rent of KRW 40 million, and the contract term from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”). Of the instant lease contract, the content relating to the instant case is as follows.

Article 3 (Term of Lease) The period of commencement of this lease shall be four years from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017.

However, upon the expiration of the lease term, the plaintiff and the defendant automatically extend the lease term only once after consultation with each other.

Article 13 (Termination of Contract) When a plaintiff falls under any of the following cases, he/she shall lose the benefit of time, and the defendant may immediately terminate this contract without giving a peremptory notice, and the plaintiff shall promptly issue an objection to the lease:

3. When the payment of rent has been in arrears three times or more, the lease contract may be amended or renewed after consultation between the parties concerned at the expiration of the term of the lease contract (Renewal of the contract).

C. On April 18, 2013, in order to prevent legal disputes under the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant made a settlement prior to the filing of the suit (However, the “applicant,” the Plaintiff, the “applicant,” and the “the entire building indicated in the attached list” in paragraph (1), shall be deemed the instant building) as follows, and the protocol of settlement prior to the filing of the suit (hereinafter “instant protocol of settlement”) was prepared.

1. The respondent stated to the applicant the whole building indicated in the attached list (hereinafter referred to as “leased building”) as “originality” in the instant protocol of conciliation by December 31, 2017, which is the expiration date of the lease contract, but it is so stated.

arrow