A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 18, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. by the Changwon District Court on March 26, 2013 and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 26, 2013.

Criminal facts

The defendant, as the owner of a game room with no trade name on the first floor below the building B at the time of smuggling, was in charge of overall management of the game room, and C and D were in charge of money exchange business at the same time while engaging in money exchange business, and the defendant, C, D and E share their roles and conspired to operate the game room.

No one shall distribute or provide a game product the rating classification of which has been refused because it constitutes a speculative game product, or display or keep it for the purpose of providing for distribution or use, or exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange, or repurchase results obtained through the use of a game product as a business.

From 08:30 on February 21, 2012 to 15:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) opened a game with approximately 165 square meters of the same day by inserting cash in the game machine; and (b) opened a yellow pressing, and the number and cartoon characters appear on the screen from 1 to 8; (c) the number is returned to the number; (d) as soon as the number is stopped, the number is cut off; and (e) the number is cut off; (e) the number is 50 points, the Defendant set up 35 "matoto" game, which is a "prote current" game, subject to the refusal of rating from 0:00 on the same day; and (e) had many unspecified customers, such as G and other general customers utilize it; and (e) made them use the game, after deducting 50 won from the fee per cash exchange of 50 billion won, the Defendant discharged 50 billion won per page.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with C, D, and E constitutes a speculative game product and thus, the defendant's use of the game product, the rating of which has been refused.