logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단3083
허위공문서작성등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who has served as Seoul Special Metropolitan City I during the period from July 25, 2014 to July 8, 2015.

The defendant, as the above I, was in charge of the overall duties of public disclosure and employment of K in 2015 by the J J K employment announcement in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor.

On April 30, 2015, there was an interview conducted against 103 persons who passed the screening process for public employment documents in L on April 30, 2015. However, in order to determine whether to pass 103 applicants, 103 persons from among nine interview members who were 3 and were divided into 1,2, and 3 were interviewed and rated for each group, and 9-11 of them were passed first, and the remaining 11-17 persons were compared with the preliminary successful candidates under each group, and 44 of them were compared with the rating points.

However, as a result of the interview, Article 1 of the following: “11 persons who have passed the preliminary test, three persons who have passed the preliminary test,” Article 2 of the “10 persons who have passed the preliminary test, five persons who have passed the preliminary test,” and Article 3 of the “10 persons who have passed the preliminary test, five persons who have passed the preliminary test,” and the total of 44 persons who have passed the preliminary test and the preliminary test are selected, the interview committee N,O, and P did not need to integrate the preliminary test candidates and compare the assessment points as above, and therefore, they stated the Defendant “the list of successful candidates, including 10 persons who have passed the preliminary test, five persons who have passed the preliminary test,” and “the list of successful candidates whose names and signatures are written only in the member signature column,” and changed the rating points of the above rating list to the extent that

Therefore, the Defendant stated the rating points to the extent that there is no change in the list of the above successful applicants, but before the interview, considered Q to pass the interview to be a request for delivery, and decided to pass the R, which was irrelevant to the list of successful applicants.

Therefore, on May 1, 2015, the Defendant is the personnel of the Seoul Central Government Office of 110 as the Sejong-gu Seoul Central Government.

arrow