logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.20 2015고단2184
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The facts charged in this case

A. On January 2014, 2014, the Defendant leased the equipment of the c “D from the 2nd floor office to the victim E” to the Defendant 1, 2014.

The project is well being carried out.

In addition, according to the food harmful factors of the hymbrow (HCCP) in the dys and coffee production plant, the company is only us.

It can be accompanied by a big contract, and the cost of certifying the sobrow is 60,000 won.

As security, D’s business takeover under the name of her mother loan the subject money to prepare a contract and made a false statement.

However, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, he/she had the intent to use the Defendant’s interior debt, unpaid personnel expenses, and company expenses in full. On June 2013, he/she had been investing KRW 360,000 from the Defendant’s senior mother F, and operated G directly. However, he/she failed to pay the agreed proceeds at all due to his/her business progress, but he/she was urged by another investor to return the investment fund equivalent to KRW 50,000,00,000 to H., and the Defendant was under a situation where he/she was liable for the debt amounting to KRW 4,550,000,00,000, such as using bonds with no monthly salary for employees, so even if the acquisition of the business was completed, there was no intent or ability to transfer D to the injured party

On January 7, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 60 million to the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant on January 7, 2014.

2. On April 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim stating that “The Defendant requires operating funds to pay money with a business in a place specified in paragraph 1, and the Defendant borrowed additional money.”

However, in fact, even if the victim borrowed money as stated in paragraph 1, the victim did not have any intent or ability to repay it, and on March 19, 2014, the amount of KRW 3,20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

arrow