Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, from April 19, 2007, as the representative director of the F Bank in the F Bank Co., Ltd., entered into a per share swap agreement with the F Bank Sung-dong Branch, and issued a per share swap, around February 2012, Defendant A had been unable to pay for the bills issued by the F Bank in lieu of the F Bank Resolution Co., Ltd., in addition to compensation equivalent to KRW 50 million in the future, and Defendant A allowed Defendant A to issue a per share swap in the name of the F Bank Resolution Co., Ltd., together with the name of the business operator of F Bank Resolution Co., Ltd.

Defendant

A between June 2012 and September 2012, through the paper of the check number No. 602 of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for the Femined Bank MG Building No. 602 and Defendant B, issued one check number H, the transaction check number of the said bank, the issue date, October 16, 2012, the face value 24 million won per face value, and the Defendants conspired to issue one check number per unit of the above bank transaction check. The Defendants issued 1 through 4, 6, 8, and 16, the total face value per unit of the attached crime No. 14,219,150,040 won, and each owner proposed payment to the said financial institution within the time limit for payment proposal, but no payment was made on each day due to the shortage of deposit or the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement, Defendant B’s partial legal statement

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each accusation book and each lot number copy;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of suspended execution: The amount of the check in this case is larger than that of this case and the amount of the check not recovered exceeds KRW 1.2 billion for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act. However, with respect to the check in this case, the check in this case was issued at the initiative of Defendant A, and with respect to the check holder, the bank of the Bank of Bankruptcy and the bank of the Bank of Bankruptcy for the recovery of damages