logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.07.24 2012고단919
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

Ⅰ. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was born to a child born out of wedlock between CW network D and E, and the Defendant was born to a child born out of wedlock due to the birth of his mother E after his birth, and the Defendant was born to a baby again through the Defendant’s husband’s hydrogen around October 1997, but the above E was married with the victim F and was married with the victim’s wife.

E has given birth to the Defendant before marriage, and it was confidential for the victim to keep the Defendant secret except for the institution of friendship. Therefore, the victim was his/her wife.

While the Defendant was frequently dicking in the victim’s house and friendly with each other, on February 2, 2004, the victim owned 402 Dong 203, Yangcheon-gu Seoul H4 Complex apartment (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”), and on March 23, 2006, 1/3 of the equity of 1785m2, 1785m2 (hereinafter “the forest of this case”) out of the 1785m2 of the YY-gun, Ginju-gun, Ginju-gun, Ginju-gun, Ginju-gun, Ginju-gun, her possession of each of the instant apartment of this case and forest of this case.

1. On March 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) intruded the victim’s house located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, into the house of the victim; and (b) stolen the instant apartment and forest land with one copy of the registration right thereof, which was owned by the victim in the Television of the television bed; and (c) stolen the instant apartment and forest land with one copy of the registration right thereof.

2. Forgery of private documents;

A. On March 23, 2011, at the Defendant’s house located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu Seoul on March 23, 201, the Defendant presented to E a paper A4 written in advance, stating that “The entire property of E and her husband F is vowed as a deed at the intervals of the suspect,” and presented it to E as a document necessary for arranging the family register relationship, and the document written by requesting the above E to be written and sealed by the signature and sealing is considered as a document necessary for arranging the family register relationship, and the document written by the above E to be signed and sealed was signed and sealed.” At the same time, the Defendant arbitrarily written the F’s resident registration number and mobile phone number and stamped the F’s seal.

In this respect.

arrow