logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.08 2015나775
물품대금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “In September 201,” “In September 201,” “in September 201,” “in September 201,” “in addition,” “in front of the 6th and 9th,” “in addition,” “in the 6th and 10th,” “in the 6th and 10th,” “in the 6th and 6th examination results of the court’s on-site inspection,” and “in the 6th and 10th examination results of the court’s on-site inspection”, the court’s explanation is identical to the ground for the first instance court’s judgment, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's main claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's counterclaim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the main claim and counterclaim is all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow