logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.03.09 2015가단35956
임대차보증금
Text

1. The Defendants order each point of the separate sheet No. 1,2,3,4,1 among the buildings listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 14, 2013, the Defendants acquired ownership of the building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) and concluded a lease agreement on August 14, 2013 with the Defendants on the leased deposit deposit amounting to KRW 50 million on the part of 163 square meters in the ship (i.e., operation of I restaurant; hereinafter referred to as the “one-story building”) connected each point of 1,23,4,1 among the 1st floor of the instant building, around August 2013, Nonparty 1 (hereinafter referred to as “A”). From August 14, 2013, the Defendants concluded a lease agreement on the leased deposit amounting to KRW 30,00 won (excluding value-added tax), management fee, lease period of KRW 300,000,000 from August 14, 2013 to August 13, 2015, the lease agreement was concluded on the leased deposit amount of KRW 130,000,000.

B. On April 2014, the Defendants sent to A a proof of the content that the lease agreement would be terminated, without paying a monthly amount of seven months for the building on the first floor of this case and the underground floor. On May 14, 2014, A sent a certificate of content that seeks compensation for operating losses with respect to the leakage of the instant underground floor and the building on the first floor. On August 25, 2014, the Defendants sent a proof of content that the Defendants sought compensation for operating losses with respect to the instant underground floor and the building on the first floor without prejudice to the repair of the instant floor and the underground floor and claimed management fees. ③ On July 20, 2015, the Defendants requested compensation for operating losses due to the leakage of the instant underground floor and the building on the first floor, and the lease agreement on the instant building on the first floor did not appear to have been terminated on August 14, 2015; ④ on August 25, 2015, it did not appear that the lease agreement on the instant underground floor was terminated.

arrow