Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 7, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) driven a car B while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.127% in blood around 02:20 on March 7, 2017, while driving the car, and driving the car at a speed of 464-0 letter 464-0 square meters in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the direction of the flow of the chemical border at a four-lane speed.

At this point, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely in a safe way by living well on the left and right of the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was negligent in driving at the same speed and received the rear panion of the D-business taxi in front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, which was driven by the victim C ( South, 49 years old) waiting for the signal above.

As a result, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, was negligent in neglecting the duty of care as a motor vehicle driver, resulting in the victim’s injury requiring approximately two weeks of care, such as light dump, tension, etc.

2. Around 02:00 on March 07, 2017, the Defendant driving a car under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 1.5 km up to 02:20 on the same day by driving a car by driving the car under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.127% in the middle of the road in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, at around 02:20 on the same day.

3. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;

(a) Defendant 1 destroyed property equivalent to KRW 6,277,048 in the estimate of the repair cost to a taxi for D business use at the same time and at the same place;

B. Along with the above vehicle, E continued to be faced with the foregoing vehicle and damaged the property equivalent to KRW 70,000 in the estimate of the repair cost.

4. The Defendant violated the Automobile Damage Compensation Act by driving the same vehicle at the same time and place as above, and driving a motor vehicle with no mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement of occurrence of traffic accidents prepared C;

1. The actual survey report;