A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:50 on March 22, 2020, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties, at around 00:50, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home to the Defendant by the police officer E and the superintendent F belonging to the police officer of the Kuju Police Station D District Unit of the Kuju Police Station, who called out after receiving a report from 112 that “I will not enter and leave the house,” and recommended the Defendant to return home from the Mar. 2, 202, “I will am back to the width, am swelth, swelth, swelth, and swelth, swelth, swelth, and swelth.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to 112 reported handling duties.

"200 Highest 516"

2. On March 20, 2020, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault against the Defendant, at his son’s hand, to restrain the Defendant, who was sent to the police station D District Unit of the original police station (the age of 28) under the direction of 112, stating that “H” located in G, in front of the original city, was “H”; and (b) the police officer I (the age of 28) who was called out after receiving a 112 report that “the fluored person was an excessive fluor,” committing an assaulting the I’s right upper part of his chest on one occasion.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report handling duties.

3. The Defendant, who is a police officer, dispatched to the site at the same date and time as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 2, demands the victim’s guards, who are the police officer, to return home at the site, to the victim “singing the victim, including K, a restaurant proprietor,” and in the presence of a jus, “singing the victim. Chewing. Chewing, the Defendant expressed the victim at a large sound.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement F, L, I, and J to each police statement of K;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment) concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.