logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.18 2016고합331 (1)
변호사법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

170,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

2. The defendant.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[The status and relation of the parties] Defendant A is a person who served as the site manager of the construction site of the Korea Housing Redevelopment and Improvement and Improvement Project Association from the end of August 2015 to the end of December 2013 as the site manager of the M Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association from the end of December 2007 to the end of December 2013.

Defendant

B The chief of Q N construction site, Defendant C is the chief of Q’s O construction site from early 2014 to July 2015, Defendant D is a person who served as the chief of Q’s O construction site, Defendant A as the chief of Q Q’s P construction site, and Defendant E as the chief of Q’s P construction site.

R is a person awarded a subcontract for removal works at the construction site of Q, N, P, U apartment, or M, while operating “S” and “T.”

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act served as the head of the site office of Q (hereinafter “ Q”) who was awarded a contract for the removal work from the N redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “N Cooperatives”), and ordered the Plaintiff to identify the company in charge of installing soundproof walls upon the occurrence of a civil petition due to noise from the removal work, etc., resulting in a failure in the progress of the construction work, and proposed that the Plaintiff, who was a management director of the union, should perform the removal work upon receiving a subcontract from Q Q at the time, inform the R, who was performing the removal work upon receiving the subcontract from Q of the said fact, to perform the

The R made a request to the Defendant that “The trade name of W is lent to the Defendant to allow the cooperative and the soundproof wall construction contract to be made.”

After accepting this, the Defendant “I would like to be better than the first company because I would like to know that I will work as an enterprise in Busan.” W W around July 2014.

arrow