(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.29 2016재나107

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.29 2016재나107

소유권말소등기

Text

1. The quasi-examination of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of quasi-examination shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Following the existence of a ruling recommending a compromise subject to quasi-re-deliberation, the following facts are either no dispute between the parties or are apparent in the records.

On December 9, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants claiming registration of preservation of ownership and cancellation of ownership transfer on the real estate indicated in each subparagraph of the attached Table, as stated in the purport of the claim, and was sentenced to a judgment accepting all the Plaintiff’s claims.

(No. 2015Kadan582). (b) Mancheon District Court 2015Kadan582.

On June 28, 2016, the Defendants appealed (Seoul District Court 2016Na50203), and this Court rendered a decision of recommending reconciliation (hereinafter “decision subject to quasi-examination”) as follows. On July 4, 2016, the original copy of the decision was the Plaintiff and Defendant B, C, Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”) D, and C, the remaining Defendants, except the Defendant B and C, were the designated parties at the appellate court.

Each service was served to the Plaintiff and the Defendants, but the said decision became final and conclusive because they did not raise any objection within the objection period.

Decisions

1. The plaintiff:

A. A. On June 28, 2016, confirmed that the payment of KRW 5,372,120 (the payment of the said money was made upon the incorporation of the said money into an expressway) from Defendant B’s text was made on June 28, 2016;

(b) 1/3 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 7 and 13 (the first part in the name of the plaintiff of the party) and 1/3 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 8 through 12 of the attached sheet (the part in the name of AA, the first part in the name of the plaintiff of the party), are owned by the defendant B;

C. It is confirmed that all the rights (as seen earlier, the money stated in the above paragraph (a) out of the money deposited in the said regular deposit passbook was already paid, excluding the money stated in the above paragraph (a)) to the Defendant B, which was made in the name of the Plaintiff, Defendant (Appointed Party) and one other.

2. The Defendants, the Defendants (Appointeds), the Defendant (Appointeds), and the designated parties on January 2016.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2018.10.24 2018재나33

-수원지방법원 2019.04.12 2017나14939

-광주지방법원 2015.11.05 2014가단35940

-대구지방법원 상주지원 2012.12.18 2012고단250

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.16 2016가단5192043