A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that there is no concern that the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defend against the crime is not likely to be substantially disadvantaged, rhythizing the facts charged without changing the indictment and recognizing the facts charged

AA Forest 11,901 square meters, AB Forest 26,182 square meters, AC 2,625 square meters, and AD 2,026 square meters prior to the permanent residence were owned by the "C" in the real estate registration register, the forest land cadastre, or the land cadastre.

From around 2004, the Defendant, among the latter descendants of CE, filed several lawsuits, such as transfer of ownership or cancellation of ownership registration, claiming that he/she was the owner of the said land, which was owned or was owned by C” on the registry, by asserting that he/she was the representative of CF from around 2004, among the latter descendants of CE, as the lineal descendants of CE, and was sentenced to dismissal by the court for the reason that he/she did not have the right to represent the said sentence. The Defendant convened a general assembly on the “CAE derivatives” at around that time, and tried to find the Defendant as the representative of CAE, and tried to find each of the said lands in the future.

However, the land of the above 4 lots was originally registered in the name of AG's lineal descendant AF, a form of AF, among the descendants of the CE, under the name of AG's lineal descendant AF. In 1981, the ownership transfer registration was completed from AH in the name of the above "C", and the graves of the above AG were gathered by the lineal descendant and the lineal descendants of the above AG. The land was managed by the above AG, and the Defendant was under the management of the above AG's lineal descendants, and not only was the part that is irrelevant to the "C" of the real estate registration injury on the said 4 lots, but also the Defendant was not the owner of the land of the above 4 lots. The Defendant was not the lineal descendant of the above AG.