logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2020.10.15 2020고정125
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the Dong Dong-si B Apartment, and the victim C (the age of 45) is the accounting of the management office of the same apartment. The defendant and the victim have caused conflicts with the issue of non-preparation of the employment contract for the apartment security guards.

On January 13, 2020, at the office of the above B apartment management office around 09:00, the Defendant, even though he was requested to return personal information because he was included in the curriculum submitted by the victim, did not put the victim into the bar, and caused bodily harm to the victim, such as being pushed down the victim's office softened, kneeing the victim's knee, kneeing the knee, kneeing the knee, and kneeing the knee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigative report (related to the change of name of a crime) the defendant and his defense counsel;

1. The summary of the assertion was the fact that the defendant assaulted the victim at the time of the instant case, but this did not lead to the location of the victim.

On the other hand, the defendant used tangible power in the process of preventing the victim from unfairly taking out the resume of the victim who submitted to the council of occupants' representatives, which constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the victim, from the investigative agency to this court, stated that “the defendant and the victim at the time of the instant case were knee and kneee and divided the victim’s clothes or chests into knee and knee.” The victim’s statement is consistent with the specific contents, ② B apartment security guards at the time of the instant case.

arrow