1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 18, 2016, while the Plaintiff was employed as a guard-based employee in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex B (hereinafter “instant apartment”), the Plaintiff was found to be employed in the guard room (3 seconds) of the instant apartment complex and was escorted to a medical institution by the 119 first aid unit and was under the diagnosis of “cerebrovascular (cerebrovascular)” (hereinafter “the instant apartment”), and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant on October 19, 2016.

B. On December 30, 2016, the Defendant rendered no objective confirmation on the occurrence of a case related to the duties within 24 hours prior to the outbreak, or rapid change in the business environment, and the fact that the work volume or work hours (48 hours) within one week prior to the outbreak, increased by at least 30% compared to ordinary work. The average work hours per week during 56 hours prior to the outbreak, the average work hours per week during 56 hours per week during 56 hours per week prior to the outbreak, does not exceed the chronic criteria due to the 56 hours per week average work hours per week prior to the outbreak, and does not exceed the 24 hours per week average work hours per week prior to the outbreak, and does not differ from the ordinary apartment guard work. The Defendant rendered a disposition of this case as to medical care under the Seoul Decision Committee (hereinafter “instant medical care”).

C. The plaintiff was dissatisfied with the request for examination but was dismissed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, 4, Eul evidence 9 and 10, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the accumulated stress due to work.