(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.04.22 2015구합12861

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.04.22 2015구합12861

유족급여등부지급처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 2015, B entered A&C and was dispatched to C hotel (hereinafter “instant hotel”) and served as D. On June 6, 2015, around 10:50, B was found to have been used as side on the front floor of the transition in the state of having panty and panty from the disabled male toilet in the hotel of the first floor of the hotel.

B. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Plaintiff, the spouse of B (hereinafter “the deceased”), “in the circular period, professional opinions, such as occupational and environmental workers,” is unclear about the cause of death; and (b) the occurrence of a sudden and difficult incident or a sudden change in the business environment related to the work within 24 hours prior to the occurrence of the occurrence; and (c) no special confirmation is made on the occurrence of the occurrence of the case or a sudden change in the business environment. Moreover, the fact or change in the business environment is not verified that the amount of work or work hours within one week prior to the occurrence of the occurrence exceeds 30% compared to the daily work; and (d) there is no occupational reason recognized to have continuously caused excessive physical or mental burden for at least 3 months prior to the occurrence of the occurrence; (b) the deceased’s work was conducted as an electric facility management for 24 hours or more at night, but it was difficult to view that the work was conducted to a certain extent or in the absence of the risk of death.”

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case"). . [Grounds for recognition] . (Ground for recognition] entry in Gap's 1 through 4, and 9 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. 1) The Deceased worked for 24 hours from 07:00 to 07:00 of the following day, and the day specified as follows.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2018.03.07 2017구단57427

-서울행정법원 2020.03.18 2018구단77169

-서울행정법원 2018.04.26 2017구합51310

-서울행정법원 2017.08.24 2016구단64145

-서울행정법원 2018.04.04 2017구단76459