The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged [2013 Height 194] The Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operated the above truck in front of the military air transportation office of the Korea Highway Corporation located at a 10 km point in Young-dong Highway on September 9, 2005, in front of the military air transportation office of the Korea Highway Corporation located at a 10 km point in Young-dong Expressway around September 18:19, 2005, while operating the B truck with a gross weight exceeding 40 tons.96 tons.

[2013 Highest 195] When the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operates C Trucks in connection with the Defendant’s business, the Defendant loaded a drilling on February 28, 2005 at the top of the lower 4.2 kilometers of the Southern Sea Line 4.2 km away from February 28, 2005 and operated the said vehicle at the 11.3 tons of more than 10 tons of statutory restriction on the 4th niven of the said truck.

[2013 Highest 196] When the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, operates a C Truck with respect to the Defendant’s business, the Defendant operated a road with a total weight exceeding 4.7 metric tons in front of the 2nd area of the 2nd area adjacent to the 2nd area adjacent to the 2nd area adjacent to the 2nd area adjacent to the 3nd area adjacent to the 3nd area adjacent to the 3nd area adjacent to the 3nd area adjacent to the 3nd area adjacent to the 40th area adjacent to the 20

2. As to Article 86, Article 83 (1) 2, and Article 54 (1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions to each of the facts charged in the instant case, (i) as to Article 86, Article 83 (1) 2, and Article 54 (1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), the Constitutional Court shall, where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act, impose a fine under the relevant Article on the corporation, which is also a violation of the Constitution (the Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 35, 38, 470 (Joint).).

Thus, each of the facts charged in this case is not a crime.