(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.29 2016가합32148

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.29 2016가합32148

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Defendant E is a party member of the H Jong-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Committee (hereinafter “Defendant member”).

(2) The Plaintiff A from August 8, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the facts incurred in the same year”) to be a person operating it, and Defendant F is a medical specialist working in the Defendant Council member.

8. A person who received hospitalized treatment by the Defendant Council member until 13. A father of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C’s mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D’s mother of Plaintiff A.

B. 1 Plaintiff A as to the background leading to the Defendant Council member and the period of hospitalized treatment

8. 8. The defendant F who diagnosed the plaintiff A as the member of the defendant Council, complained of symptoms, such as heat heat (38.3C), pyropsye, urine pain, urology, urology, urology, urology, and urology. In addition to the above symptoms of the plaintiff A, in addition to the above symptoms of the plaintiff F, the defendant F, who diagnosed the plaintiff A, observed that the part connected with the vertebage of spine at his hand was caused by severe pain in light of the fact that the son was proved to have the past ability of urine infection, and was diagnosed to be doubtful that the plaintiff A was suspected of being hospitalized into the defendant Council, and conducted an emergency urology test, blood, plesye and urology test, and a urology test with respect to the plaintiff A.

Although the result of the crypology test was not observed as a result of the crypology test, the crypology was confirmed as 3-5/HPF (normal value: 1-4/5/HPF) and a little number of cypology was detected as a result of the crypology test, Defendant F administered the Plaintiff’s crypology (Ciproflxacin) and haloga (Gamamacin) and requested the Plaintiff to perform the cypology test, while Defendant F administered the Plaintiff’s crypology (Ciproflxacin) and the halogacin.

8. 9. 9. I notified the results of the general urine test in advance, and according to this, the urgical urgical urgical urgical urgical urgical argical argical arg

2. The Plaintiff A’s symptoms and Defendant after the Plaintiff’s admission into the Defendant Council member.

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2017.05.18 2016나2008419

-울산지방법원 2014.02.06 2012가합8587

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.11 2013가합76067

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.03 2014가합520677

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.24 2014가합543830