logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.04.28 2017고단245
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On June 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of imprisonment and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act at the Cheongju District Court’s Assistance, and completed the enforcement on April 5, 2016.

[2] On March 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) thought that the Defendant sent a door to impose compulsory performance again on the illegal building case that was already closed around 09:40 on March 2, 2017; and (b) as he finds the Chungcheong audience B and the office located at the 21st head in the Chungcheong City, the Habro, the Habro, the Habro, the 21st head of the Habro, the Habro, the Habro, the 19th public official C (19 years old) in the position of the 9th public official in the position of the 19th public official in the office of the person in charge,

It interfered with a public official's legitimate control and management of illegal buildings by making it possible to keep his/her name known to him/her, and her cellular phone that he/she used in his/her hand go to C, making him/her face on his/her chest, etc., after making his/her left side of the above C, and interfered with the public official's legitimate control and management of buildings.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each statement of D and C;

1. Investigation report (to attach a medical certificate of injury, hear statements by damaged public officials, or attach a summary order in violation of the Building Act to the suspect);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history, report on investigation (report on the period of suspect repeated crime and execution of punishment) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning personal confinement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended sentence] the scope of the mitigated sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that interferes with the performance of official duties, and the mitigated area (one month to eight months) [the person who is subject to special sentencing] is not subject to the punishment;

2. Determination of sentence: The defendant in April 200 has led to the confession of all of the crimes in this case and reflect in depth, and the injured party has not been punished by the defendant due to the unanimous agreement with the victim.

However, the defendant finds viewing during the period of repeated crime and suspension of execution of punishment and takes charge of the control and management of illegal buildings.

arrow