logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.03.09 2016고단598
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 21, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) received a report from the Defendant, who was drunk at a “D” restaurant operated by Chang Chang-gun, Chang-gun, and was asked about the details of the report from the police officer F, G, etc. of the police box affiliated with the North Korean Senior Police Station Emb, which was dispatched to the site; and (b) received inquiries from the Defendant on the details of the report.

At the same time as “Is the G, I can legally punish police officers when I have been sicked.” Then I can legally punish police officers when I have been sicked.

“I have heard the words “I have become subject to punishment in this case.”

A serious bucker, such as "I ambbs", committed violence on the part of the above G, such as putting the chest of the above G on two occasions, putting the back part of the above G one, and walking the right buck part on two occasions, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate performance of duties concerning the public peace and security.

2. The defendant who inflicts property damage shall drink together with the defendant at the same time and place as paragraph (1).

H and vagabonds were put on the height door of the above restaurant, and the house tab B B B B B B attached the 1st head of the glass hold equivalent to 50,000 won in the market value of the victim C, which is owned by the victim. As above, the above G continued to take a bath, and one empty bottle was placed on the above entrance, and damage the 50,000 won in the market value of the victim, which is the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement G and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to receipts;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation, community service order Act Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and Act on the Protection, Observation, etc.

arrow