1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is subject to Paragraph (1).

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., "three future treatment costs" in the judgment of the court of first instance (from 8th to 9th 7th e.g., the judgment of the court of first instance) (from 8th e.g., the judgment of the court of first instance), as well as the part concerning the period treatment costs and calculation of future treatment costs, respectively, according to the reduction of the plaintiff's claim at the court of first instance, shall be used as follows. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, i.e., the defendant's assertion as the grounds for appeal, except for adding or adding the following 3rd e.g., the grounds for appeal, is as follows:

[2) “The ground for recognition: Gap’s treatment expenses (each statement in Gap evidence 7,9,11 through 14) - KRW 10,780,00 for the medical expenses of the Dvalescent hospital (= KRW 4,180,000 + KRW 5,400,00 + KRW 1,200 + KRW 1,200) for the medical expenses of the defendant hospital + KRW 1,289,430 for the medical expenses of the defendant hospital + + KRW 871,30 + + KRW 7,600 + KRW 16,100 + KRW 13,490 + KRW 13,490 + KRW 6,700 + KRW 1,832,540 for the day following the judgment of the court of first instance + KRW 700 for the damages calculated at the rate of KRW 1,80,740 for the plaintiff’s total damages calculated at the judgment of 50% for the day after the judgment of second instance.