logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2016나4791
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claim of the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) and the plaintiffs that changed from the trial of the first instance, is as follows.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. From 3th to 4th 1st 1st 1st am of the first instance judgment, the part used "as a result of the physical examination on the Head of Korea University Hospital, the results of the physical examination on the Head of Korea University Hospital, the Korean Medical Association, the Chief of Korea National University University University Hospital, and the Chief of Korea University Hospital" shall read "as a result of the physical examination on the Head of Korea University University University Hospital, the results of the examination on the Head of Korea University University Hospital, the results of the examination on the Head of Korea University Hospital, the results of the examination on the Head of Korea University Hospital, the results of the examination on the Head of Korea University Hospital, the results of the examination on the physical examination on the Head of Korea University University University Hospital, the Head of Korea Medical Association of the first instance Court, the Chief of Korea National University Hospital, and the Chief of Korea University Hospital".

The five pages of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

"Calculation: 13,790,768 of the first instance judgment" shall be replaced by the following table:

Part V of the judgment of the first instance court shall add the following:

Of KRW 3,118,369, Plaintiff A’s treatment fees: (a) considering the degree of contribution at KRW 3,104,769, excluding KRW 13,60,00, for medical expenses with no causal link with the instant accident, Plaintiff A’s treatment fees shall be KRW 1,552,384 (=3,104,769 x 1-50%). Plaintiff A’s treatment fees shall be KRW 1,552,384 (=3,104,769 x 1-50%). Nonparty 5, 7, and the last action shall be conducted as follows.

C. The Plaintiff A requires KRW 3,321,591 annually as medical expenses, special medical expenses, examination expenses, etc. from the day following the date of closing argument in the trial to March 12, 2017, seven years from the date of the instant accident for the purpose of pain treatment, including KRW 585,333, medicine expenses, and treatment fees, etc.

If this is calculated on the basis of the date of the accident, 2,948,554 won is as follows.

arrow