logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.06.22 2017고단78
실화
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2016, at around 14:20 on May 25, 2016, the Defendant, on the house roof D located in the East Sea C, engaged in a melting work to fix the support unit for the solar boiler pipes.

At the time, the above roof was covered by a string steel plate that could easily rise when the high temperature becomes high, and there was a small gap between the above iron plates, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to ensure that the fire does not occur by taking measures against those who use the string fire to prevent the string of the above steel plates from sprinking.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not fully install a water spacing cover installed on the roof floor in order to prevent the spacing fireworks from contacted with iron plates within the radius of work by which the spacing flames can be spaced off, and caused the steel plates to be dried up or the spaced into the roof through the iron spaculating spaculat, while being melting, by putting the steel plates up, or by putting the roof into the roof into the roof through the spaculating spaculat, and put the roof into the front upper part and the inner wall of the D owned.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the house owned D by the foregoing negligence to take a amount equivalent to KRW 33,866,00,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Results of fire site identification;

1. Application of response Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of cooperation with on-site investigation;

1. Article 170 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the fire of this case was caused by the electrical factors inside the ceiling, not by the negligence of the defendant's contact work, but by the electrical factors inside the ceiling.

According to each evidence of the judgment, the following facts can be acknowledged:

① This case.

arrow