The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since the roof degradation of the house where the Defendant used a luxing work did not have any lux, there was no lux in the luxing fire, the fire of this case cannot occur due to the luxing fire entered by the luxing fire.

B. The flames that occurred from the Defendant’s contact work did not fall off at one place, and most of the Defendant covered the top.

(c)

The fire of this case is likely to be caused by putting the wires inside the roof to the underground rehesion with excessive heat.

2. Around May 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 14:20 on May 25, 2016, performed a melting work to fix the stove boiler support stand on the roof of D’s house located in the East Sea C.

At the time, the above roof was covered by a string steel plate that could easily rise when the high temperature becomes high, and there was a small gap between the above iron plates, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to ensure that the fire does not occur by taking measures against those who use the string fire to prevent the string of the above steel plates from sprinking.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not fully install a water spacing cover installed on the roof floor in order to prevent the spacing fireworks from contacted with iron plates within the radius of work by which the spacing flames can be spaced off, and caused the steel plates to be dried up or the spaced into the roof through the iron spaculating spaculat, while being melting, by putting the steel plates up, or by putting the roof into the roof into the roof through the spaculating spaculat, and put the roof into the front upper part and the inner wall of the D owned.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the house owned D by the foregoing negligence to take a amount equivalent to KRW 33,866,00,000.

3. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment, the lower court held that the Defendant was not guilty.