logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2016.04.29 2015누6003
포상금지급거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial of the court of first instance while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if both the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the statement in Gap's evidence submitted in the court of first instance were examined.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, the court's explanation on this case is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 15 of the Enforcement Decree of the Passenger Transport Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 25764, Nov. 21, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25764, Nov. 21, 2014; Presidential Decree of the Passenger Transport Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Enforcement Decree of the Passenger Transport Act") of the second 15th judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be the "Enforcement Decree of the Passenger Transport Service Act" of the former Enforcement Decree of the Passenger Transport Act, and the "Enforcement Decree of the Passenger Transport Service Act" of the fifth 8

Part 6 [Attachment 3] of the 8th sentence of the first instance court shall be as follows:

The criteria for revoking business licenses, revoking business licenses, and suspending business operations (related to Article 43 (1))

2. Individual standards:

(a) Where he/she violates the prohibition of use of name under Article 12 (including cases applied mutatis mutandis under Article 35 of the Act) of the Act; 13. Where he/she violates the matters to be observed under Article 85 (1) 13; 24. Where he/she violates matters to be observed under Article 21 (8) of the Act;

(t) If a general taxi transportation business operator provides a person who is not a transport employee under his/her control (including a person who is not a transport employee under his/her control, notwithstanding an employment contract in the form) with a motor vehicle for transport business (excluding cases permitted under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes), he/she shall suspend part of the business (90 days).

arrow