logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.13 2019누44479
입찰참가자격제한처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the Act on Contracts to Which a Local Government Is a Party is a Party is stipulated under the former Act on Contracts to Which a Local Government is a Party; (b) the Enforcement Decree of the former Enforcement Decree of the Local Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29059, Jul. 24, 2018; hereinafter "Enforcement Decree of the Local Contracts Act") is as the former Enforcement Decree of the Local Contracts Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29059, Jul. 24, 2018; hereinafter "Enforcement Rule of the Local Contracts Act"), and (c) the Enforcement Rule of the former Enforcement Rule of the Local Contracts Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security No. 125, Jun. 25, 2019; hereinafter "Enforcement Rule of the Local Contracts Act").

The relevant portion shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the first instance court at the conclusion is justifiable.

The defendant's appeal shall be dismissed for lack of good cause.

arrow