logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.04.26 2017고단1853
업무상과실치사등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months and by imprisonment for six months, respectively;

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A is the representative director of the Dispute Settlement Co., Ltd., a corporation which mainly established the atmospheric environment measurement agency, and Defendant B is the person in charge of safety management in the E factory site in which the director of the Air Quality Team C and the Air Quality Measurement Work is entrusted with the E-factory work site, and Victim F(25) was dispatched to G University Air Quality Engineering and the students in the fourth year.

On September 1, 2017, the above Defendants engaged in measuring the atmospheric environment entrusted by E in the Roofstack 2 heading machine located in Gusi-si Ha on September 1, 2017, and Defendant A was dispatched from the victim to the trainee for analysis and management in Gusi-si Ha, and thus, Defendant A shall not have the victim perform duties different from the contents of the training at a place other than the place of the training. Even if the air environment measurement is conducted by the victim, the above chimney falls under a place or facility where the worker is at a risk of falling or falling, and thus, it is difficult for the victim to install a work board or install a work board to take measures necessary for preventing the falling risk, such as requiring the worker to wear a safety stand, and the Defendant B has the duty of care to supervise and supervise the damaged person in performing measuring the air environment along with the victim so that he/she can properly observe the above work safety rules.

Nevertheless, the above Defendants neglected the above duty of care, and Defendant A did not instruct the victim to conduct air quality measurement work, not in the field of practice and field, but did not observe the safety rules at the time of work, and Defendant B was placed in a high place with knowledge that the victim is not qualified to conduct air quality measurement.

Not only requires the measurement of the environment, but also the victim's atmosphere measurement work at the site.

arrow